Task based on Frankenstein novel
You are going to stage a mock trial where the acussed is going to be Victor Frankenstein for the charges of negligence, malpractice, and emotional and physical distress. The trial, like the novel, can have science-fiction or fantasy elements. The case will be heard in civil court, where a suit is brought by one individual (plaintiff) against another (defendant), whereas in criminal court, the case is between the state (prosecution) and the defendant.
Court
You will be divided into 2 groups, Defendants (FOR) and Prosecution attorneys (AGAINST) each group must develop the arguments according to your position
Roles in the court
Defendants (FOR):
Prosecution attorneys (AGAINST):
Accused: Victor Frankenstein
Bailiff
Jury:
Accused: a person or persons charged in a court of law with a crime, offense, etc.
Prosecuting attorney: a government official who conducts criminal prosecutions on behalf of the state
Defense counsel: a lawyer who is in charge of defending an accused in the court
Witness: a close observer; someone who looks at something
Bailiff: He/she is the person who keeps order in the court
Guilty: responsible for or chargeable with a reprehensible act; or marked by guilt; "guilty of murder"
Glossary
Negligence: failure to act with the prudence that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances. Carelessness.
Malpractice: a wrongful act that the actor had no right to do; improper professional conduct; "he charged them with electoral malpractices"
Distress: psychological suffering
Verdict: the finding or decision of a jury on the matter submitted to it in trial.
Vocabulary for debates and Discussion
When you want to state an opinion:
- In my opinion____
- I think that_____
- I feel that______
- I believe that______
- It seems to me that________
- If you ask me_____
- I'd say that_______
- The point is________
- As I see it_______
- I'd say that______
- The point is______
When you want someone to repeat or explain:
- I don't understand what you mean
- Would you explain that, please?
- I'm sorry, but I didn't understand your point.
- Could you give an example?
- What do you mean by_____?
When you want to agree with someone:
- You're right
- I think so, too
- I agree with you
- You could be right
- I couldn't agree more
- That's a good point
- I couldn't agree more
- I see what you mean
- That's just what I was thinking
- I agree entirely
- You know, that's exactly what I think
When you want to disagree with someone (in ascending order of formality):
- Yes, but_____
- I disagree
- That's not the point
- No, I think you're wrong
- Up to a point, but________
- Yes, that's quite true, but_____
- I'm not sure I quite agree
- Well, you have a point there, but_____
- Perhaps, but don't you think that_____
- I see what you mean, but________
These can be some arguments you can use in the trial:
1. Some scholars have used Frankenstein as a central piece in their argument against the development of cloning technology. Others argue that the problem was not with Victor Frankenstein's scientific methods but with his responses to his creation—that we should develop cloning technology, but use it wisely. Debate whether the novel is either “for” or “against” cloning. Support your argument with passages from the book.
2. One of the tragedies of Frankenstein is the refusal of other characters in the novel to recognize the monster as a full human being. Brainstorm a list of the qualities that make us human. Which of these qualities does the monster have? Which does he not have?
3. Discuss the role that nature plays in Shelley's novel. Include examples that support your answer.
4. Analyze Mary Shelley's use of setting throughout the novel. Why, for example, does she use the Arctic as the setting for Victor Frankenstein's final confrontation with his creation?
In order to carry out the trial, it is necessary to write your arguments before the discussion, so how are you going to write your arguments?
Adapted from: http://bogglesworldesl.com/
Write down your thesis statement, supporting points and examples as shown in the chart. Then, publish this exercise in comments. It must be ready for next class!
What is an essay?
How to write an essay?
How to build arguments
In order to carry out the trial, it is necessary to write your arguments before the discussion, so how are you going to write your arguments?
First of all, it is necessary to have a thesis statement which will be the main point of your argument.
Example of thesis statement:
Victor Frankenstein is guilty because he was an irresponsible scientist.
Then, it is important to support your point of view with facts. Facts are statements that can be proven by direct experience or objective verification; they can be the result of research or investigation.
Supporting Points
|
Examples
|
1.Victor Frankenstein committed several illegal acts
|
a.VF stole corpses
b.VF made experiments that were not allowed by the scientific community
|
Finally, expressions to support your point of view are used to organize your ideas in a logical way.
In my opinion, …
To begin with, …
First of all, …
According to some studies, …
As far as I'm concerned, …
|
Use these expressions to introduce your first point.
|
Furthermore, …
More importantly, …
Above all else, …
|
Use these expressions to connect your points and to show your most important points.
|
For example,
For instance,
|
Use these expressions to introduce examples or facts.
|
In summary, I want to point out that …
In conclusion, …
Therefore, …
|
Use these expressions to conclude your ideas.
|
Example of an argument:
In my opinion, Victor Frankenstein is guilty because he was an irresponsible scientist.First of all, VF stole parts of dead people or paid for the corpses. Furthermore, VF made experiments that were not allowed by the scientific community, being such experiments illegal. Another reason... And above all else, ... In conclusion,...
Assignment:Write down your thesis statement, supporting points and examples as shown in the chart. Then, publish this exercise in comments. It must be ready for next class!
What is an essay?
How to write an essay?
Basic 5-Paragraph (Argument) Essay Outline:
Introductory Points and Thesis Statement _______________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
The major SUPPORTING points I wish to make in this essay are:
1. __________________________________________________________________________________________
A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example)
B. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example)
2. ____________________________________________________________________________________
A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example)
B. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example)
3. _________________________________________________________________________________________
A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example)
B. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example)
Conclusion Points ________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
To begin with we must recognize that as humans, we naturally need to find all the reasons for our existence. The question is: At what cost?
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion, VF is guilty because he didn't respect the ethical codes and legal regulations that exist among the investigations about the human beings; for example: The Nüremberg Code in 1947. Furthermore, VF stole parts of dead people or paid for the corpses for personal investigations and not for the benefits for the science and the community.
Another reason is that VF didn't do anything when he discovered that his experiment was out of control and this caused that the monster looked for answer regardless the consequences.
In conclusion I accuse VF for being an irresponsible scientist and practice illegal procedures.
VERY GOOD ARGUMENTS AND WRITING ANDREA!
EliminarTo begin with VF is guilty because he was a crazy scientist wanting to violate the laws of nature.
ResponderEliminarMade experiments that were not allowed the creator of all.
To begin with, the monster creed by VF would be shaped with remains of human beings to getting them of corpses stolen. Furthermore, VF is not a doctor because neither is mentioned en nowhere of the chapters,
In summary, I want to point out VF is the real villain and is guilty of the disasters that bring your family. Therefore VF is a scientist who works overcome thinking through science barriers that improve the lives of men.
In conclusion I accused to VF for trying violating the laws of nature
To begin with VF is guilty because he was a crazy scientist wanting to violate the laws of nature. HE made experiments that were not allowed BY the creator of all.
Eliminar(To begin with) FURTHERMORE, the monster (creed) CREATED by VF (would be) WAS shaped with remains of human (beings) BODIES to getting them (of) FROM STOLEN corpses (stolen). (Furthermore) MORE IMPORTANTLY, VF is not a doctor because (neither) HE WAS (is) NOT mentioned (en) IN (nowhere) NONE of the chapters,
In summary, I want to point out VF is the real villain and is guilty of the disasters that bring TO (your) HIS family. Therefore VF is a scientist who works overcome thinking through science barriers that improve the lives of men. (I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS IDEA)
In conclusion I accused (to) VF for trying TO (violating) VIOLATE the laws of nature
GOOD ARGUMENTS LUIS, WRITE AGAIN THE IDEA I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND AND CORRECT YOUR MISTAKES!
To begin with VF is guilty because he was a crazy scientist wanting to violate the laws of nature. He made experiments that were not allowed by the creator of all.
EliminarFurthermore, the monster created by VF was shaped with remains of human bodies to getting them from stolen corpses more importantly; VF is not a doctor because he was not mentioned in none of the chapters,
In summary, i want to point out VF is the real villain and is guilty of the disasters that bring to his family. Therefore VF is a scientist who worked en overcome limits science for improve the lives of men.
In conclusion i accused VF for trying to violate the laws of nature
GOOD JOB LUIS, NOW IT IS MUCH BETTER!
EliminarYOUR GRADE: 4.0
As far as I'm concerned Victor Frankenstein is guilty of malpractice of his profession, because first He deliberately made illegal experiments with human bodies this in order to create and give life to a perfect being, demonstrating the corrupt morality of Victor Frankenstein and the lack of respect for human beings, after his successful experiment. He was negligent when allowing the escape of the being that he created which caused several dead including some family and friends of Victor Frankenstein. For last In conclusion Victor Frankenstein was selfish and he has had of a twisted mind because he does not think about his actions and the consequences of these he of malpractice of your profession
ResponderEliminarAs far as I'm concerned Victor Frankenstein is guilty of malpractice of his profession, because first He deliberately made illegal experiments with human bodies (this) in order to create and give life to a perfect being, demonstrating the corrupt morality of Victor Frankenstein and the lack of respect for human beings, after his successful experiment. He was negligent when HE allowED(ing) TO (the) escape (of) the being that he created which caused several (dead) MURDERS including some family and friends of Victor Frankenstein. (For last) In conclusion Victor Frankenstein was selfish and he (has) had (of) a twisted mind because he (does) DID not think about his actions and the consequences of (these he) HIS (of) malpractice of (your) HIS profession
EliminarGOOD ARGUMENTS LUISA! CORRECT YOUR MISTAKES AND POST IT AGAIN CORRECTED.
As far as I'm concerned Victor Frankenstein is guilty of malpractice of his profession, because first He deliberately made illegal experiments with human bodies in order to create and give life to a perfect being, demonstrating the corrupt morality of Victor Frankenstein and the lack of respect for human beings, after his successful experiment. He was negligent when he allowed to escape the being that he created which caused several murders including some family and friends of Victor Frankenstein. In conclusion Victor Frankenstein was selfish and he had a twisted mind because he did not think about his actions and the consequences of his malpractice of his profession
EliminarVERY GOOD JOB LUISA! NOW IT IS MUCH BETTER!
EliminarYOUR GRADE: 4.3
In my opinion VF is guilty for misused knowledge and wrong proceeds with his creation. First of all for good for the wrong the human being to used his knowledge for get advances. For example VF stole corpses for his experiment was dedicated to make a human. He had the delusions a creation perfect and beautiful but not he had on account the impact of his actions Furthermore VF has given life to his creation abandoned to his lucky Above all he carried to his creation to hate the humanity by affection lack In summary, I want to point out that VF is the responsible his crimes. The monster is a creation abandoned and rejected by his creator a being that not know it was love or hate.
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion VF is guilty for misused knowledge and wrong proceeds with his creation. First of all for good for the wrong the human being to used his knowledge for get advances. (I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS IDEA) For example VF stole corpses for his experiment (was dedicated) AND USED THEM to make a human BEING. He had the delusions (a creation) OF CREATING A perfect and beautiful HUMAN BEING but HE DID not (he had) TAKE INTO (on) account the impact of his actions. Furthermore VF (has given) GAVE life to his creation AND abandoned HIM to his luck(y) Above all he (carried to) MADE his creation to hate the humanity (by) FOR HIS LACK OF affection (lack). In summary, I want to point out that VF is the responsible OF his crimes. The monster is aN ABANDONED creation (abandoned) and rejected by his creator, a being that DID not know WHETHER it was loveD or hateD.
EliminarGOOD ARGUMENTS CAROLINA, WRITE AGAIN THE IDEA I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND AND CORRECT YOUR MISTAKES!
In my opinion VF is guilty for misused knowledge and wrong proceeds with His creation. For example VF stole corpses for His experiment and used them to make a human being. He had the delusions of creating a perfect and beautiful human begin but He did not take into account the impact of His actions. Furthermore VF gave life to his creation and abandoned Him to His luck Above all He made his creation to hate the humanity for His lack affection. In summary, I want to point out that VF is the responsible of His crimes. The monster is an abandoned creation and rejected by His creator, a being that did not know whether it was loved or hated.
EliminarIn conclusion VF gave misused to knowledge that possessed and caused much damage to Him family and to His creation.
I think that VF is guilty, because I tricked her teacher Willian who trust that he would destroy documents when the VF instead I keep to create illegal human experiments , betraying their professional ethics. Ivan experiments not aimed at helping society, but the creation of a perfect being , which he said consisted of being handsome , kind and intelligent.
ResponderEliminarBesides that because of his carelessness , the creature that he had created caused the death of many people.
In conclusion, VF is guilty, because I did wrong to deceive the teacher, believing themselves more powerful than God , betrayed his professional ethics, life miserable for many people, their ambition and excessive selfishness .
I think that VF is guilty, because (I) HE tricked her teacher Willian who trustED that he would destroy documents when the VF instead I keep to create illegal human experiments , betraying their professional ethics. Ivan experiments not aimed at helping society, but the creation of a perfect being , which he said consisted of being handsome , kind and intelligent.
EliminarBesides that because of his carelessness , the creature that he had created caused the death of many people.
In conclusion, VF is guilty, because I did wrong to deceive the teacher, believing themselves more powerful than God , betrayed his professional ethics, life miserable for many people, their ambition and excessive selfishness .
IT IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND YOUR IDEAS. I PREFER TO DO THE CORRECTIONS WITH YOU.
In my opinion all see guilty to VF, but have never thought about that person were your. VF was a passionate scientist who saw possible the creation of life and would use it wisely, create an almost perfect being.
ResponderEliminarthe way the perform experiment was not right, but in an age without technology and of misery. PHYSICALLY VF created a monster but his heart and mind although created, were damaged by society. Justified in the book "I was not a monster When I was made. I was as innocent as a baby. The world Could have made me into a lion or a lamb, and it made me into a monster."
In conclusion, not only is VF adjudicate , but see his reasons. VF end payment with interest for its creation,what for judge him more. It is not necessary that people look like monsters to be.
That's all for now from your lawyer.
In my opinion (all) EVERYBODY CAN (see) CONSIDER VF guilty (to VF), but THEY have never thought about that person COULD BE (were your) YOU. VF was a passionate scientist who saw possible the creation of life and would use it wisely, HE createD an almost perfect being.
Eliminarthe way THAT HE (the perform) DID THE experiment was not right, but in an age without technology and (of) misery ....... PHYSICALLY VF created a monster but his heart and mind although created, were damaged by society. AND IT WAS Justified in the book "I was not a monster When I was made. I was as innocent as a baby. The world Could have made me into a lion or a lamb, and it made me into a monster."
In conclusion, not only is VF adjudicateD , but see his reasons. VF endED (payment) PAYING with interestS for (its) HIS creation, (what for) WHY DO YOU judge him more. It is not necessary that people look like monsters to be.?????
That's all for now from your lawyer.
WEIMAR, YOU HAVE GOOD ARGUMENTS BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO DEVELOP MORE AND BETTER YOUR IDEAS!
In my opinion everybody can consider VF guilty , but they have never thought about that person could be you. VF was a passionate scientist who saw possible the creation of life and would use it wisely, he created an almost perfect being.
Eliminarthe way that he did the experiment was not right, but in an age without technology and misery ....... PHYSICALLY VF created a monster but his heart and mind although created, were damaged by society. and it was justified in the book "i was not a monster when i was made. i was as innocent as a baby. the world could have made me into a lion or a lamb, and it made me into a monster."
in conclusion, not only is VF adjudicated , but see his reasons. if VF didn´t broken the rules of medical science, nowadays we would not have a better health intervention. VF ended paying with interests for his creation, why do you judge him more. it is not necessary that people look like monsters to be a monster.
To begin with VF only is a scientist that i was looking for the good of humanity, but is not a reason for that broke the law i think that his ambition led him to the madness on everything that led to his experiment and put at risk the health and integrity of the other people with the creation of such an abomination in which ami with regard should be given exemplary punishment peri tell me you Mr judge already has not suffered enough this man when we see that his family was murdered, completely destroyed by its own creation
ResponderEliminarTo begin with VF only is a scientist that (i) was looking for the good of humanity, but IT is not a reason (for that broke) TO BREAK the law i think that his ambition led him to the madness on everything that led to his experiment and put at risk the health and integrity of the other people with the creation of such an abomination in which ami??? with regard should be given exemplary punishment peri???? tell me you Mr judge already has not suffered enough this man when we see that his family was murdered, completely destroyed by its own creation
EliminarDAVID: YOUR ARGUMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR, DID YOU USE A TRANSLATOR? STUDY THE LESSON ABOUT HOW TO WRITE AN ARGUMENT, YOU CAN FIND IT IN THIS SAME PAGE!
In my opinion VF is guilty, because it is an unconscious and intolerant scientist. To Begin with, VF created the creature and he did not thought in the welfare of the creature, because, the society was not prepared to see this creation and for this reason the creature was mad because it was alone in the world. Above all else, the creature tried to convince to VF create a wife to have a support in the world. But VF did not create. In conclusion, VF made the creature unconsciously kill these people because it was alone in the world.
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion VF is guilty(,) because (it) HE is an unconscious and intolerant scientist. To Begin with, VF created the creature and he did not (thought) THINK in the welfare of the creature, because, the society was not prepared to see this creation and for this reason the creature was mad because it was alone in the world. Above all else, the creature tried to convince (to) VF TO create a wife to have a support in the world. But VF did not create HER. In conclusion, VF made the creature unconsciously kill these people because it was alone in the world.
EliminarGOOD JOB ALEJANDRO, YOUR IDEAS ARE CONCISE AND YOUR WRITING SIMPLE BUT COHERENT!
In my opinion VF is guilty because he is an unconscious and intolerant scientist. To Begin with, VF created the creature and he did not think in the welfare of the creature, because, the society was not prepared to see this creation and for this reason the creature was mad also it was alone in the world. Above all else, the creature tried to convince VF to create a wife to have a support for the creature in the world. But VF did not create her. In conclusion, VF made the creature unconsciously kill these people because it was alone in the world.
EliminarMankind is linked to a process of constant change, where different characters have left their mark, either for growth or degrowth of this process. Victor Franckenstein was a great scientist and humanist, driven by different events that marked his life, was interested in contributing to this process proving that life can be beyond birth, reproduction and death.
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion Victor Frankenstein is innocent because many reasons.
First of all, Victor Frankenstein wanted to help science and humanity searching for a method to prolong life and should be valued for their effort and sacrifice to find ways to meet its target. It should also take into account the benefits brought its rigorous study to the science of health. For example: the use of electricity discharges to revive bodies or the use of tissues outside a disabled individual. And while all this was against the law and brought severe consequences to society by the scandals that sponsored this subject, all that was absolutely necessary to discover these advances we later would benefit the entire society. Moreover, it is wrong to accuse him of murder, because he used parts of people who were already dead, including people who had been sentenced to death for their crimes.
In conclusion I suggest Victor declared innocent on the grounds that it has contributed greatly to the science of health for the future of humanity.
Case closed.
Mankind is linked to a process of constant change, where different characters have left their mark, either for growth or degrowth of this process. Victor Fran(c)kenstein was a great scientist and humanist, driven by different events that marked his life, HE was interested in contributing to this process proving that life can be beyond birth, reproduction and death.
EliminarIn my opinion Victor Frankenstein is innocent because OF many reasons.
First of all, Victor Frankenstein wanted to help science and humanity searching for a method to prolong life and should be valued for (their) HIS effort and sacrifice to find ways to meet its target. It should also take into account the benefits THAT its rigorous study brought to the science of health. For example: the use of electricity discharges to revive bodies or the use of tissues outside a disabled individual. And while all this was against the law and brought severe consequences to society by the scandals that sponsored this subject, all that was absolutely necessary to discover these advances we later would benefit the entire society. Moreover, it is wrong to accuse him of murder, because he used parts of people who were already dead, including people who had been sentenced to death for their crimes.
In conclusion I suggest Victor TO BE declared innocent on the grounds that it has contributed greatly to the science of health for the future of humanity.
Case closed.
EXCELLENT ARGUMENTS AND WRITING, CONGRATULATIONS HUGO!
Mankind is linked to a process of constant change, where different characters have left their mark, either for growth or degrowth of this process. Victor Franckenstein was a great scientist and humanist, driven by different events that marked his life, he was interested in contributing to this process proving that life can be beyond birth, reproduction and death.
EliminarIn my opinion Victor Franckenstein is innocent because of many reasons.
First of all, Victor Franckenstein wanted to help science and humanity searching for a method to prolong life and should be valued for his effort and sacrifice to find ways to meet its target. It should also take into account the benefits that its rigorous study brought to the science of health. For example: the use of electricity discharges to revive bodies or the use of tissues outside a disabled individual. And while all this was against the law and brought severe consequences to society by the scandals that sponsored this subject, all that was absolutely necessary to discover these advances we later would benefit the entire society. Moreover, it is wrong to accuse him of murder, because he used parts of people who were already dead, including people who had been sentenced to death for their crimes.
In conclusion I suggest Victor to be declared innocent on the grounds that it has contributed greatly to the science of health for the future of humanity.
Case closed.
In my opinion, to judge VF must contemplate the situations that led him to commit acts so questioned, intentions and results. For starters take into account the greed of people is infinite, and primarily the fact of looking for the secret of life, for various applications, looking at this from the point of view of VF, one could say that his intention was good, motivated by the deaths of loved ones more important reasons are the methods which we considered immoral; for example: VF stole parts of the dead bodies or paid to research, hide such an important science and the fact feed his ego to want to own a perfect creature investigation. In short I want to note that I share the interest of the research conducted, but completely reject the methods and the aim of the research, so I find it guilty of perpetrating human integrity to conduct experiments with corpses.
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion, to judge VF must contemplate the situations that led him to commit acts so questioned, intentions and results. (For starters) TO START WITH, take into account the greed of people is infinite, and primarily the fact of looking for the secret of life, for various applications, looking at this from the point of view of VF, one could say that his intention was good, motivated by the deaths of loved ones more important reasons are the methods which we considered immoral; for example: VF stole parts of the dead bodies or paid to research, hide such an important science and the fact feed his ego to want to own a perfect creature investigation. In short I want to (note) NOTICE that I share the interest of the research conducted, but completely reject the methods and the aim of the research, so I find (it) HIM guilty of perpetrating human integrity to conduct experiments with corpses.
EliminarMMM FREDY, IT SOUNDS A DIRECT TRANSLATION FROM SPANISH INTO ENGLISH, AM I WRONG? YOU EXPOSE INTERESTING ARGUMENTS BUT IT IS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND SOME IDEAS. PUNCTUATION IS REQUIRED!
in my opinion we should understand the situations that make VF commit that acts to judge him. in first, i think that VF`s attitude is very selfish cause he is looking for the secret of life, no matter what, but he is doing it for several applications in the world of science, but the method used by VF can be inmoral for the fact of taking some parts of dead bodies that mean something for his or her family an love ones. in conclusion, the intention of this text is to show that I`m not on disagree about the science research but there are limitations, and VF don`t see or understand that limits, so I`m on disagree hit his method and I think he is guilty
EliminarI think most people have a purpose in life, a goal, many people want to do something that leaves a mark, quequede in history, and in this case VF wanted to create life, discover the elixir of life, and this was its goal, and I just took so at the end it was not like he wanted and why I think he's innocent.
ResponderEliminarSometimes purposes that involve more effort, and may have consequences in this case was going against morals, creating a creature with pieces of human corpses, but I think he did it for a good, a good for science and humanity . I also think that VF is innocent because other people are to blame for the creature began to be rebellious rejection that gave him.
VF also makes efforts to destroy the creature, destroy his creation, even if he tried revenge.
In conclusion I think that VF is innocent by taking a big step in the science and humanity, and for me, VF was not his fault that things did not go well in the end.
In my opinion, Victor Frankenstein is guilty because he wanted to create life as God. And the only one who can create life is God.
ResponderEliminarOther reason he was stealing bodies and experimented with them which I think is an act deplorable.
Is also responsible for the killings than the monster did.
In conclusion i accused VF to violate the laws of God and nature and killing
Este comentario ha sido eliminado por el autor.
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion VF is inocent because he don wanted to act bad. He only wanted to find a way for extend life. It was very complicated for VF can to discovering new things becuase he was very intellgent but the society was very conservative and didn't accept anything abnormal. he was a excellent scientist. He took parts of humans for creating a new creature, for me is excellent, and i would like to know how a person could do another creature.These results brought benefits to people as the evolution of health and the application of science in this
ResponderEliminarI think that VF is innocent because he wanted to help science and he looking form a alternative to prolong life. His behavior was propelled for the love to his mother. I think that many people has come to think how to bring to life again to our dear parents and VF was beyond and I do not blame.
ResponderEliminarI feel that VF is innocent, because:
ResponderEliminarThe crimes are not inheritable and VF don’t make a criminal, the creature is another living being and he have rights, the persons attack to the creature and naturally he defend to the attack .
Other point is, the creature independently for this appearance he It should not be excluded.
VF in his profession have access to the bodies from the dead people, and the dead bodies not have a rights because the medical mission is first (in this case the investigation, so it was not published or not produced the best results).
Nothing is trained to decide who is human, who is an animal and decided who lives or who die.
The creature decides revenge because VF under pressure decides no create another creature, VF isn’t responsible to the acts from the creature searching revenge.